Environment Minister André Boisclair will not back down on his proposed ban of
28 pesticides despite a threat from the giant U.S. pesticide industry of legal
action against Quebec under Chapter 11 of the North American Free Trade
Agreement.
"I am not surprised to hear that kind of reaction," the minister
said yesterday. "If there is a parallel, it is with what happened with the
tobacco producers the day the government decided to adopt restrictive
legislation."
On Thursday, Donald Page, executive director of the Industry Task Force II on
2,4-D Research, a body funded by the four North American manufacturers of the
weedkiller 2,4-D - Dow AgroSciences, BASF, Nufarm Inc. and Agro-Gor S.A. - said
the industry would sue under Chapter 11 of NAFTA if Boisclair insists on
adopting the ban.
Boisclair unveiled regulations on Wednesday that will become law on Sept. 3,
60 days after consultations, imposing fines up to $30,000 for the use of the
listed pesticides after three years.
The government and public-sector bodies, such as school commissions,
hospitals and daycare centres, will stop using the products right away.
In the first year, mixtures of pesticides and herbicides would be banned. In
year two, the listed products would be removed from garden-supply shelves.
Page said Quebec must prove 2,4-D is a cancer-causing product, arguing that
it has not been shown to be a carcinogen.
Onil Samuel, science adviser to Quebec's Institut National de Santé Publique,
acknowledged yesterday that the proof isn't definitive but said: "There is
considerable evidence that it could be."
Boisclair said the pesticide industry is following the tactics of the tobacco
industry, which funded research for years suggesting that the link between lung
cancer and cigarettes had not been proven.
The task force Page heads is conducting a $30-million (U.S.) research program
to show that 2,4-D is safe.
"I maintain that it is completely legal for us to make the decisions we
have made," the minister said.
"We have made the right decision and I think Quebecers will not be
surprised to see certain companies react."
Boisclair is undeterred by the Chapter 11 process, which allows private
companies to sue governments. "I am convinced that public opinion will
prevail and that the law we are using justifies making this decision," he
said.
Crompton Corp., the American company that makes lindane - another product
Boisclair intends to ban - has notified the Canadian government it will seek
$100 million U.S. in damages under Chapter 11 because Canada has banned lindane,
described by the Pesticide Action Network of North America as a POP, or
persistent organic pollutant, that can cause dizziness, seizures, nervous system
damage, immune system damage and possibly cancer.
Angela Rickman of the Sierra Club of Canada said pesticide makers are trying
to use Chapter 11 for its "possible chill effect."
"They (Quebec) don't have to prove (2,4-D) is a carcinogen," she
said, noting there is evidence that 2,4-D can affect the endocrine and nervous
systems of children.
She praised Boisclair for standing up to the pesticide industry and said in
the end public opinion against pesticides will prevail.
- Kevin Dougherty's E-mail address is kdougherty@thegazette.southam.ca.