Environmental Health Perspectives
Volume 109, Number 6, June 2001
Every child is born a potential genius.
R. Buckminster Fuller
Lindane is losing much of any luster it once had. The pesticide, once widely
used to kill lice and a variety of pests that attack agricultural products,
livestock, and trees, has slowly been eliminated from many applications since
the mid-1970s. As long ago as the early 1980s, three U.S. organizations
petitioned the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to ban
lindane following
an FDA doctor's advisory that the pesticide caused seizures in children and test
animals. In two of the latest actions, the European Commission ruled in December
2000 that member states must withdraw all authorizations for plant protection
products containing lindane, and California approved legislation in September
2000 that banned lindane-based products used to treat lice and scabies. Many
groups lobbied heavily to have lindane added to the list of 12 persistent
organic pollutants banned by the Stockholm Convention signed in May 2001. (It
could still be added to a codicil to be developed once the convention comes into
force.)
Lindane, known technically by synonyms such as gamma benzene hexachloride and
gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane, has been in use for about 50 years. Researchers
have found that the long-lasting chemical can cause liver, kidney, neurologic,
and immune system damage; birth defects; cancer; and death. It may also be an
endocrine disrupter.
However, the FDA considers
lindane an acceptable pesticide for killing lice
and treating scabies when used according to the labeled instructions. Several
companies still sell lindane-based lotions and shampoos. Numerous other
pesticides, such as malathion, permethrin, and pyrethrins, also are used in
products that target lice and scabies. To help reduce all pesticide exposures,
alternative methods to detect and possibly remove lice, such as wet combing, are
gaining favor in some circles.
| Louse on the loose? Lindane,
a chemical traditionally used to kill lice and other pests, has been banned by
the European Commission and the state of California due to health concerns,
particularly for children.
Illustration: Dennis D. Juranek/Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention
|
For broader indoor and outdoor uses such as wood fumigation and agricultural
pest control, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is in the midst of
evaluating lindane as part of its reregistration process for this and many other
pesticides. At present, lindane is approved only for seed treatments to fight
pests such as wireworms and white grubs that attack crops such as cantaloupes,
lentils, and wheat.
Such plant-protection uses are no longer valid in the 15 European Union
countries. On 20 December 2000, the European Commission--primarily concerned
with the safety of operators exposed to the pesticide and the adverse impacts
the chemical has on the environment--banned lindane for those purposes, allowing
18 months for users and producers to phase out existing stocks. But lindane may
still be used for nonagricultural purposes such as household pesticides.
The ban follows actions taken by several member countries and a 1999 Austrian
risk assessment that concluded the chemical is a possible carcinogen with no
safe exposure level. In 2000 lindane
was also found by the French Institute for
the Environment in a number of French waterways that are used as drinking water
sources. European environmental activists support the announcement, though Helen
Lynn, health coordinator for the London-based Women's Environmental Network,
stated in a 13 July 2000 Friends of the Earth press release that "whilst we
welcome today's decision, we are disappointed that the public will still be
exposed to this dangerous chemical in the home."
Water degradation and the ensuing impacts on human health and the environment
were the primary drivers behind California's ban, scheduled to go into effect 1
January 2002. Research in the Los Angeles basin in 1999 revealed that, when
lindane shampoos were rinsed down the drain, the pesticide readily contaminated
the effluent and eventually the downstream waterways. Cutting down on
lindane
use through educational campaigns conducted prior to approval of the ban reduced
contamination by an average of 50%, says Ann Heil, senior engineer for the
Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County. The continued use of lindane as a
seed treatment shouldn't have much impact on water contamination, she adds.
However, lindane pervades the food supply. In the Total Diet Study, an FDA
project published in September 2000, lindane was found in dozens of foods, such
as evaporated milk, ground beef, pork chops, chicken, lima beans, peanuts,
popcorn, and breads. The levels of contamination aren't sufficient to cause
health problems, FDA officials say. But little information exists on the
interactions lindane may be having with the dozen or more other chemical
contaminants typically associated with food production--for instance, benzene
and chlorpyrifos--that are often found in tandem with
lindane. -Bob Weinhold
http://ehpnet1.niehs.nih.gov/docs/2001/109-6/forum.html |