Organochlorine Insecticides and Breast Cancer
Essam E. Enan, Ph.D.
University of California, Davis
Award Type: RFA
Duration: 3 yrs., 1997-2000
Initial Award Abstract
Recent epidemiological evidence suggests that there is a relationship between
the incidence of breast cancer and the presence of organochlorine insecticides
in the body. There are many study results indicating that environmental factors
have strong influence on the occurrence of breast cancer and that estrogenic
actions of various chemicals are one of the most strongly suspected contributing
factors. The overall objective of this project is to understand the cellular
mechanisms by which organochlorine pesticides act to cause cancer-like
transformation of human breast cancer cells under laboratory (in vitro)
conditions.
The role of environmental organochlorines in breast cancer is the subject of
continuing debate and research. Epidemiological studies have reported numerous
environmental chemical contaminants to be present in normal and cancerous breast
tissue, including organochlorine insecticides and polychlorinated biphenyls. The
proposed study will address the interaction between estrogen and insecticides in
human breast cancer cells and normal cells. Specifically, we will study the role
of growth factors and the process of transmitting the growth cues from outside
of the cell to the cellular proteins (signal transduction) in the
insecticide-induced foci formation (a biomarker for cancer promotion).
Our preliminary study identified two components involved in the signal
transduction pathway in human breast cancer cells that are activated by
organochlorine insecticide treatment. These two components are c-Neu kinase and
c-src kinase. We believe that the interaction between these two enzymes is a key
point at which organochlorine insecticides promote breast cancer. Our study will
address whether the blocking of c-Neu and c-src kinases signaling using specific
inhibitors for these two enzymes will prevent the induction of foci formation by
organochlorine insecticides in cells. In addition, we will examine the
interaction of DDT and Lindane with the estrogen response pathway in breast
cancer cells. Furthermore, it is the goal of this proposal to identify and
establish a biomarker for early detection of breast cancer promotion. We will
compare the level of pesticide residues found in breast tissues of cancer
patients with the levels that are required to affect breast cancer cells in the
laboratory.
Why are these basic mechanistic studies on cell transformation necessary? The
major benefits of these studies are to provide the logical basis for
understanding the action of pesticides on breast tissue and to identify other
environmental chemicals that may increase the risk of breast cancer in exposed
women.
Final Report (1998)
Breast cancer incidences has been steadily rising during the past two or
three decades, a trend characterized by increasing rates among
estrogen-responsive tumors, by continuing increases among older women, and by
growing numbers in both developed and developing countries. The incidence of
breast cancer in the United States has increased a modest 8% among women under
50 years of age, while it has risen 32.1% among women in the age group of 50
years or older. This upward shift is consistent with the historical pattern of
accumulation of organochlorine residues in the environment. The overall
objective of this proposal was to understand cellular mechanisms by which
organochlorine pesticides act to cause transformation in human breast cancer
cells (MCF-7) under laboratory conditions. Our data showed that among several
test organochlorine insecticides, lindane-like chemicals and DDT-like chemicals
increased MCF-7 cell proliferation as judged by cell count and 3H-thymidine
incorporation (a measure of DNA replication). This effect was dose-dependent and
it is likely to involve both an estrogen receptor-dependent pathway and an
estrogen receptor-independent pathway as judged by the effect of DDT-like
chemicals that bind to the estrogen receptor and lindane-like chemicals that do
not bind to the estrogen receptor on MCF-10A (a breast cell linethat does not
have estrogen receptors) vs. MCF-7 (a cell line that a lot of these receptors).
Our data also showed that beta-HCH, a relative of lindane, significantly
decreased PKA activity and significantly increased the oncogene protein, cSrc
kinase activity in MCF-10A. An opposite effect for beta-HCH on these two
signaling proteins was found in MCF-7 cells. More importantly, this toxicant
decreased the amount of the tumor suppressor protein p53 and increased the DNA
binding activity of AP-1. The functional status of the wild-type p53 activity
and AP-1 subunits is still under investigation in our laboratory.
In our effort to block the proliferative effect of this type of toxicant on
MCF-7 cells, geldanamycin, the c-Src kinase inhibitor was applied at different
concentrations with and without beta-HCH. At high concentrations (10 ng
geldanamycin/ml), the effect of beta-HCH on 3H-thymidine
incorporation was decreased by 35%. Lower concentrations of geldanamycin did not
affect beta-HCH action. The disadvantages of using 10 ng geldanamycin/ml are: 1)
it is toxic to the cells after 5-7 days of treatment; 2) it is not highly
specific to the c-Src kinase; and 3) it has a toxic effect on steroid hormone
receptors, particularly those receptors that form a heterodimer with the heat
shock protein 90 (hsp90).
Therefore, we used another signaling protein modulator, forskolin, that
induces the intracellular production of cAMP. The data showed that forskolin at
physiological concentration (5 m M) antagonized the proliferative effects of
beta-HCH without any effect on cell viability as was found with geldanamycin.
From these data it is obvious that signaling protein components play a key role
in the proliferative and estrogenicity of several environmental toxicants.
Therefore, an understanding of the role of signal transduction pathways in the
environmental toxicants may provide important clues for developing chemical
therapies to retard their toxic action.
http://www.ucop.edu/srphome/bcrp/progressreport/abstracts/biology/3pb0095.html
|